2012年2月12日

A test think of individual definition

Why we must know ourselves at the traditional throughout way? --- In its vacuum culture as a language file.
 Culture never say that is a special at a specific thinking. Human said we are the humane what be of changes. Of course it wouldn't be so far as itself for their cultural biases.
 A modern revolution which of governmental knowledge had done the cruel thing but, that member had got out from the apartment of culture. A loneliness of the humanity at individuality is the good, for their traditional enlightening. This specific achievement of anti-nationalism is a new tradition, of ourselves by side of world Geist, which makes hegemony for the group power not to the justice of good at specific individuality.
 We can read or write this individuality by side of the cultural logic, this structure of self-differant games are only logistics of format maker at geopolitical morality. So, we made these law decision by side of the structural meaning at the language file, but these had never made ever individual thinking for their lawyer suit. A space of the differant leading is a cause of miss at the definition. A word is got a meaning themselves, we could never get otherwise for them. A word shouldn't be got another meaning for themselves by the individual leading. Polysemy is not the good for their understanding for out of the cultural bias.
 Modern cultures are same to this point of view. Difference of the differant meaning shouldn't be rewarding 'enlightening thought' for the nothing division. A confusion of the word, for example bad as a harm for themselves is to be brushed up from self-definition sphere.