Why they did telling the truth of things.
They wont to be respected from same group, for their ability via competition in their minimal fact. It was a truth.
Words are made from their re-tangible appeal. I saw the human made their individually by minimal action, on their will. It could be called appearance for religious individuals.
For example, nation state or many role of groups tells you that why we made the religion through its conduction. It was called respective activity from their individual religion.
An ulterior acting motivation is the truth for their religious think. It can be watched today as their critical understanding by side on life. People said their note for communication or company with every person. The criticism is the latest style within a livelihood.
A poet, a scientist or somebody critics their understanding toward the world, to use the word and its collective culture. These communicative requests did hierarchical grouping above the individual homage. Loneliness is only able to save their original thinking custom.
To know the truth has been reliable being to stay some community for this specific language. In the fact, truth is only the religion their correspondence meeting, by talking, telling something which be divided cultural methink.
To say that we having the intelligence should be reflected ignorance for themselves who made the cultural word. At misery, other person will never understand its domestic critic, international cognitive thesis, for example to make trans regional religion. The philosophy why answer this question, that is to know otherwise, on another perspective from cultural biased recognition which be the whole world.
Why contemporary or old-time philosopher never said that we could not get with all other human being for its cultural biases by irregular word understanding or using. A truth is not the only fact looked like the only fabricated personal world from a cultural bias. Not only science of contemporary, but also other communicative religion.
